satyaprakash wrote:then why not follow Bagawad Gita itself? Why this look alike knowledge is needed? Going to the original is always good. Duplicates and look alikes may not be needed at all. :?: Satya
1)Will you say what the Gita directs to follow?
2)Forget about BKs(they are very few when compared to population of Hindus). Then why Hindus are weak in the world? Not only in world- even in India itself, that too being majority!
Why other religions succeeded attacking India and looted its wealth? Why being so many so called Jagadgurus in India, India is still weak. Why even many saints (many were really good) have been in India, India could not be made powerful and united?
3)Why Hindus are getting converted into other religions very easily?
4)What is the meaning of dharmabhrasht? [One thing is clearly visible- Hindus are those who get converted(bhrashth) from their religion (dharma). So Hindus are at present who easily get dharmabhrashth. Why? the reason is- they do not know what is their originality.
5)What is original name of ancient religion of India? When the word Hindu itself is given by other religions and Indians(people of Bharat) nodded (accepted) it, does it not clearly imply Indians do not know their originality?
When they do not know originality, then how can you say the lowkik Gita is original (truly religious)?
Also- it is said "sarvashaastramayi shiromani = mother of all the scripture
" for Gita. Such a high respect and name is there for it. Now- when there is such a great scripture, do other religions ( at least Hindus*) believe that Gita knowledge is for them too? Also when there is such a great scripture for at least Hindus, how come many other scripyures arouse in India? [There are 18 puraanaas, countless upanishads, 4 vedas, and many more things and books]
*Most unfortunate thing is even Hindus do not consider that Gita is for them. Very few people even in Hindus will be reading Gita! That too those who believe just on Krishna. When it is written as "Bhagavaanuvaach = words of God" in Gita one should know who is God first, is it not?
Krishna is believed just by some percentage fo Hindus. Then how can Gita be mother of all religions? Actually God is common for all the religions, is it not? So he has to speak words when all the religions exist in this world, is it not? So he has to incarnate when there are all the religions. But why there is no mention of any religion in lowkik Gita? Why not even name of Hindu is mentioned in Gita if it is scripture of Hinduism?
Arey- Do we need so much things for our life? Actually one should not depend on medicine(scripture). If one depends on many medicines, it definitely means his health is weaker. Other religions have just one scripture. But Hindus have many! How did this happen and this definitely implies Hindus are weak. [a lady needs just one huusband and a child just one mother. Too many husbands and parents imply the child is orphan and the lady is weak and bhrashth= vyabhichaari]
Also- unity can exist in a religion if there is just one scripture for it. But for Hindus, they have many!
The main reason is- Hindus could not understand Gita. Hence it became useless. So other scriptures came. Otherwise, if its real significance had been understood, no one would have interest to create another one. Like- if there is first class product already available in market (for the cheapest price), no other product can stand in market.
Just see- Gita is the smallest one in size. And has highest teachings (If you wish I will try to explain how its teachings are highest)
6)Why Indians at present run to other countries for jobs?
So- unless the real significance of Gita is understood, Indians will be weak and poor.
7)It is said- religion is might. Today Hindus do not know about their real religion.Hence they have become weak. So it is time to know about their religion(ancient religion ) of India.
8)Gita knowledge is called as Rajayog. Can you explain how it is Rajayog?
9) Also did God came to give justice for just 5 pandavas? That too for his relative - Arjun? So- is God so much partial and silly?
10)Did God speak Gita in sanscrit that too- in that shloka form? Were they speakig in the form of shloka everyday in their life? If not, then does not that imply the sanscrit Gita is not real word of God. Someone has written them in that form? So how can you say it is original Gita?
Thank you and regards to sweet child of the most beloved incorporeal Supreme Godfather, real Gita sermonizer SHIV= ShivBaba.