Audio recordings v/s paper Murli
Revised class is not available.
Audio link for 26.11.68.A.M: http://www.PBKs.info/Streaming/MP3/bma/1968/113.mp3
Paper Murli link for 26.11.68.A.M: http://PBKs.info/Streaming/MP3/bma/scan/914.pdf
Instead of addressing the readers, I should address the duplicate Brahma Baba of BKs while writing my posts to make it little entertaining, from now onwards.
1. It is written in the paper Murli on 2nd line of 3rd page, "All impure ones are born through vikh (vice- Sex lust)".
In the audio at 23.14 mins, instead of vikh (vice- Sex lust), you say 'vishta' (Hindi word Vishta means Faeces/ Excrement in English) and then you say '(...are born through) urine'.
What rubbish is this? How will anyone on the earth has ever born through faeces?
How come paper Murli is accurate if it is derived from the audio?
Should we think BKs or someone has corrected it in the paper Murli?
Never. It is just that you mis-read it. I mean, you are only reading the pre-narrated Murlis. The paper Murli is original and not the audio
2. It is written in the paper Murli in page no.3, line no. 7, "Morarji Desai is going to inaugurate in Delhi".
This is a real incident. When this Murli was narrated through the real Brahma or Dada Lekhraj, around the same time, Morarji Desai was coming to inaugurate a center or museum in Delhi.
But, when you were reading this Murli on 26.11.68, there was no such incident was happening. So you have to skip it and that's exactly what you did in the audio.
The paper Murli says, 'Earlier, whoever used to come to inaugurate, (we) would give them the message (of God). Similarly, we will give the message to Morarji Desai who is going to inaugurate in Delhi".
In the audio at 24.42 mins, you read everything else. But, why did not you mention 'Morarji Desai'? You even gave an extra example that 'Pope used to come to inaugurate and we used to give them the message', which is not present in the paper Murli.
But when it comes to Morarji Desai, you make a generic statement in the audio like 'Whoever comes to inaugurate here, we will give them God's message".
I don't think it needs further explanation.
Audio link for 13.4.68.AM : http://www.PBKs.info/Streaming/MP3/bma/1968/34.mp3
Paper Murli link for 13.4.68.AM : http://PBKs.info/Streaming/MP3/bma/scan/608.pdf
Revised English Murli (1.3.2019): http://www.bkmurlitoday.com/2019/02/bra ... glish.html
It is written in the paper Murli in 1st page on 9th line, "I sit with you, I play with you...But it is not that I eat with you. Because, the Father (Shiv) does not eat (as he has no body of his own)".
[Revised Murli is translated incorrectly, the above lines are the actual translation of original Hindi Murli].
In the audio at 2.05 mins, you exactly say that line which is not supposed to be said and you don't say those which are written in the paper Murli. So, you say " It is said, I eat with you....". Then you try to correct it by saying, "It is not that I eat along with you..", which is a little modified version of the next line in the paper Murli.
But why do you always say incorrect things in the audio?
Paper Murli says "I sit with you, I play with you...But it is not that I eat with you....", which is correct. Because, Shiv doesn't eat.
But in the audio, you only say "I eat with you....", which is completely wrong and you don't say "I sit with you, I play with you..".
Do you still want me to believe that you are the real Dada Lekhraj Brahma? I am not a fool.
I don't even need proofs. Just by looking at the way you narrate the Murlis, the way you behave in the audio, I can grasp a lot many things which prove that you are not the original Dada Lekhraj Brahma.
1.References of page number and line number of the paper Murli, which are provided here, are based on original Hindi Murli.
2. Audio recordings are available only in Hindi language.