Questions for BKs

DEDICATED to BKs.
For those involved with the Brahma Kumaris, to discuss issues about the BKWSU in a free and open manner.
Post Reply
User avatar
yogi108
BK
Posts: 137
Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by yogi108 » 04 Aug 2008

Very happy to know that you are very much interested in Dharna. Can I know to what extent you have conquered lust? I have disclosed about me in this forum.
Mbhat,

I do not even discuss this with the Seniors and Bap-Dada himself as to what extent I have conquered LUST... just because you have opened up in the forum you cannot expect it to be done by the others ... while you are at it ... what is your definition of LUST... is it just not looking at women with those evil eyes or to say how will this one be in bed ...

Brother Grow up in Gyan ... stop being a Parrot coz many in the BK world for many many years are just that ... its so easy to narrate points of Gyan but to even understand it needs an intellect which is pure ... for me Purity is about understanding what is being said in the Murli to start with rather than talk about being celibate and talk about percentage of conquering LUST ...

Yogi

new knowledge
Academic
Posts: 463
Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: questioning bk-pbk knowledge

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by new knowledge » 04 Aug 2008

mbbhat wrote:I am not supporting BKs for their faults. But what I am saying is, finding faults in BKs is greater fault than that.
Brother mbbhat, I am not interested in faults, scandals, corruptions in BKs. If a compounder illegally behaves like a doctor, then is it not obligation of a patient to oppose the compounder? Even then, would you suggest the patient that finding faults in that compounder is greater fault than that though you are sure that the compounder is illegally acting like a doctor???

User avatar
fluffy bunny
ex-BKWSU
Posts: 5365
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: ex-BK. Interested in historical revisionism, failed predictions and abuse within the BK movement.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by fluffy bunny » 04 Aug 2008

new knowledge wrote:If a compounder illegally behaves like a doctor, then is it not obligation of a patient to oppose the compounder? Even then, would you suggest the patient that finding faults in that compounder is greater fault than that though you are sure that the compounder is illegally acting like a doctor???
Or to put it more simply, if you went to a psychiatric hospital and met a mental patient who thought he was a doctor ... would you not alert the authorities if they were practising on other patients?

As new knowledge points out, there is a difference between 'prurient interest', a candid interest and public interest, i.e. social concern. Where those "faults, scandals, corruption" spill out and into the general society, affecting other individuals and their families life, then the general public has every right to be warned ... and we, as witnesses, have a duty to do so.

I suppose having "conquered lust to 80%" means that he only gets 20% erections for which there are two cures now ... Viagra. Or even more classes from Dadi Janki. If there is one thing that disgusts me even more than the gross vices, it is face-saving and suppression in order to avoid rightful "shame".

new knowledge
Academic
Posts: 463
Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: questioning bk-pbk knowledge

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by new knowledge » 04 Aug 2008

Brothers mbbhat & yogi, you know that Murlis & Avyakt Vanis are being uploaded in this website without the official permission of authorities of BKWSO. Are you in favour of or in opposition to this issue?

User avatar
fluffy bunny
ex-BKWSU
Posts: 5365
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: ex-BK. Interested in historical revisionism, failed predictions and abuse within the BK movement.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by fluffy bunny » 04 Aug 2008

new knowledge wrote:Brothers mbbhat & yogi, you know that Murlis & Avyakt Vanis are being uploaded in this website without the official permission of authorities of BKWSO. Are you in favour of or in opposition to this issue?
Its true. Apart from some on this forum, there are three places to find them;

The Avyakt Murli summaries - from over 3 decades
The Encyclopedia - which is my favourite as one can search them (see also Avyakt Murlis), and
The library - where there are selections to download.

Personally, I do not believe that any individual has the right to intercede between another individual and their god. The relationship should be direct. Who the hell do the leadership think they are to put themselves above others? For those concerned BKs reading this ... please download, circulate and enjoy them with your fellow BKs. Surely the highest of karmas by your values, mr bhat?

mbbhat
BK
Posts: 3265
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I am a Bk and a writer. I have been benefited a lot by the knowledge given in BK institution. I also have materials written totally on logic without BK knowledge. Anyone can get them as attachments for free by email.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by mbbhat » 04 Aug 2008

yogi108 wrote:Brother Grow up in Gyan ... stop being a Parrot coz many in the BK world for many many years are just that ... its so easy to narrate points of Gyan but to even understand it needs an intellect which is pure ... for me Purity is about understanding what is being said in the Murli to start with rather than talk about being celibate and talk about percentage of conquering LUST ...
Dear Yogi soul,

If you are talking or commenting to me privately, I would have just waved my hand and leave. I may not utter a word. But this is a public place where I can do seva. You may interpret me as you wish. I am not unhappy. I have already got two private messages from two souls and they have pleaded their guilty for commenting BKs. I had already got this success within first month.

Since you are a Bk, your comment makes me happier. I am sure that you will progress in your life even if you think bad of me. In fact, I think you will not be able to think bad of me for long time. Let us see. Wish you great success. I can understand your pain. My reply was not just to you dear yogi soul. My reply was to all those who read this forum.

Dear new knowledge soul,

I am not against or in favour of putting Murlis in this forum. baba has already said, "when the creator is satisfied by this drama, you the children of the creator should be satisfied by every event". I have no complaint at all, dear souls.

Dear ex- l soul,

For the time being, I may not have interest or time to answer you.

User avatar
yogi108
BK
Posts: 137
Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by yogi108 » 05 Aug 2008

Mbhat soul,

I do not know if you quite understand where I am coming from. I am not here to comment on you .. but just giving you some pieces of truth I have picked being associated with the BKs ...

I am only telling you ... God loves everyone ... but he loves the ones who love him the most ... but more than that he loves the ones who understand him in totality ...

All I am saying is try to understand what is being said in the Murli and your third eye will really open.

Yogi

User avatar
bansy
Posts: 1643
Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by bansy » 05 Aug 2008

new knowledge wrote:Brothers mbbhat & yogi, you know that Murlis & Avyakt Vanis are being uploaded in this website without the official permission of authorities of BKWSO. Are you in favour of or in opposition to this issue?
Sometime back, I was in the process of discussing with some senior sisters about putting some Murlis up regularly. (See True unlimited service : Do you want Murlis?). The process is still going on.

The reason why they are hesitant of doing so is because they realise there are members on this forum (or simply passers by) who are trying to act like BKs but they do not go to the centre, and they therefore expect to be able to obtain Murlis here for their own private and selfish needs, whilst claiming they are a BK and use all the pride as a BK but yet they serve neither their own spiritual brothers and sisters or their centres, and yet continue to churn out their own classes and lectures, without guidance or authorisation.

The sisters commented that as master bestowers, treasures (Murlis) and jewels of knowledge may be given to all those whom you come into contact, and feel that those who have uploaded or provided Murlis onto this site do so for good intent for discussion and churning. However, there are those who just want to take, and the worst of the kind who do this are those who say they are BKs but do not go to the centre daily and yet are giving lectures and Gyan of their own accord. They are not so concerned for souls who no longer are affiliated with the BKWSU as such peoples will always debate, but are disappointed at those who claim to be BKs but no longer make the effort to go to their respective centres.

So the problem (for me) in the process from now on is this. Even if such forum members were to leave this forum, it would make no difference. If Murlis are uploaded, such "BKs will still be able logon and are able download the Murlis. Whereas they should be attending a centre and supporting their BK family. So you see, these very hidden "BKs" are the ones who get in the way of those who genuinely want the Murlis. In a sense, these hidden "BKs" are limiting the unlimited service the Seniors are trying to perform. The BKs outdoing themselves.

User avatar
bansy
Posts: 1643
Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by bansy » 05 Aug 2008

And before anyone suggests from my previous post that the BKWSU should upload Murlis to the internet regardless of who is here or there, well they still need their devotees, but it is these very devotees who are abandoning them and are also undermining what they do it seems.

User avatar
fluffy bunny
ex-BKWSU
Posts: 5365
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: ex-BK. Interested in historical revisionism, failed predictions and abuse within the BK movement.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by fluffy bunny » 06 Aug 2008

bansy wrote:The reason why they are hesitant of doing so is because they realise there are members on this forum (or simply passers by) who are trying to act like BKs but they do not go to the centre, and they therefore expect to be able to obtain Murlis here for their own private and selfish needs, whilst claiming they are a BK and use all the pride as a BK but yet they serve neither their own spiritual Brothers and Sisters or their centres, and yet continue to churn out their own classes and lectures, without guidance or authorisation.
All fair comments, of course ... welcome to humanity. I would say that there are more "authorised" problem cases than "unauthorised" problem cases. By their fruits, ye shall know them.

I am reminded, however, of the story of Jonah and Nineveh. Historically, "God", or even good, always bets on very slim odds and presumed the positive rather than negative.

Why should we care about defending those afraid of losing their centralised positions of power to a more level, anarchic approach to wisdom? The evidence is that the leadership is neither trustworthy nor that enlightened.
  • Trust in the people, I say ... it cant be any worse than it is now.

User avatar
tom
ex-BK
Posts: 139
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: Mahatma Gandhi said first :"God is Truth", ultimately he said "Truth is God"
which made me a member of this forum.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by tom » 06 Aug 2008

bansy wrote:I was in the process of discussing with some senior Sisters about putting some Murlis up regularly. (See True unlimited service: Do you want Murlis?). The process is still going on.
For almost 9 months they have been discussing. Let them discuss.

I would not bother. Let these "master bestowers" sit on their "treasures" for ever. These "jewels" seem to warm them up.

This a matter of conscience for all BKs visiting this website and learning from the documents and Murlis uploaded from the previous posters. If they feel OK by only taking and not giving anything in return, it is their own dharna and karma.

If you plant a tree you don't think of those who could one day cut this tree and and make sticks of it to beat other human beings.

mbbhat
BK
Posts: 3265
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I am a Bk and a writer. I have been benefited a lot by the knowledge given in BK institution. I also have materials written totally on logic without BK knowledge. Anyone can get them as attachments for free by email.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by mbbhat » 07 Aug 2008

yogi108 wrote:All I am saying is try to understand what is being said in the Murli and your third eye will really open.Yogi
Dear Yogi soul,

If your third eye is fully open, the instead of asking questions, will you please answer your own questions?

Dear Tom soul,

I treat this forum as given to me by drama and baba. If you think this forum is yours, you have your share in this or you have contributed a lot to this, it is up to you. What we give, is not accepted. A drunkard desires just alcohol. We are trying to cure his habit. I have already said that a person's needs are to be fulfilled, not desires.

User avatar
Surya_40
Posts: 142
Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Affinity to the BKWSU: Academic
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I have friends with the BKs, PBKs, Vishnu Party, etc., who consider their group to be great, by quoting Murli points.
I want to understand and take only the positive essence from different views of various groups.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by Surya_40 » 22 Feb 2010

Is there any Murli point for stating "Shankar Party"/"Vishnu Parties" ? if so please Quote

mbbhat
BK
Posts: 3265
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I am a Bk and a writer. I have been benefited a lot by the knowledge given in BK institution. I also have materials written totally on logic without BK knowledge. Anyone can get them as attachments for free by email.

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by mbbhat » 23 Feb 2010

No. So far i have not heard. But there are Murli points which say- others may copy BK philosophy and they are called as liars

new knowledge
Academic
Posts: 463
Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Affinity to the BKWSU: ex-BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: questioning bk-pbk knowledge

Re: Questions for BKs

Post by new knowledge » 23 May 2011

An abstract from wikipedia
Since 1978, the BKWSU is accused of falsifying claims internationally that its current leader and relative of the founder Dadi Janki Kripalani is "the most stable mind in the world".* Journalists quoted archivists at the University in question and "found no mention of the experiments performed on Dadi Janki in 1978". Indeed, they could not even "find any University of Texas organization called the Medical and Science Research Institute." **
References
*"Companion of God": BKWSU. Retrieved 2009-02-28

Code: Select all

. "In 1978 Scientists at the Medical and Science Research Institute at the University of Texas, USA examined the brain wave pattern of BK Dadi Janki, Joint Chief of Brahma Kumaris. She was described as the ‘most stable mind in the world’ as her mental state remained completely undisturbed whilst undergoing tests at the Institute)"
[size=150][b]**[/b][/size] [url=http://www.rickross.com/reference/general/general924.html]"What's the truth?"[/url]: The Keinnyung Gazette, South Korea. Retrieved 2007-04-26. "Dadi Janki, now in her nineties, has been a member of the BKWSU from the beginning. Her current official title is Joint Administrative Head of the Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University. According to the BKWSU ... Dadi Janki was declared by scientists from the University of Texas’ Medical and Science Research Institute in 1978 as having the most stable mind in the world. The Gazette contacted an archivist at the University of Texas Archives who replied, “I have searched the likely places and found no mention of the experiments performed on Dadi Janki in 1978. Indeed, I did not even find any University of Texas organization called the Medical and Science Research Institute." Despite evidence that the institute that ran those experiments never existed, Dadi Janki recently described to the Indian news site http://www.tribuneindia.com the experiments carried out on her and repeated the claim."[/quote]
What"s the truth??

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests