BK-PBK.Info - for BKs, PBKs and BKWSU or AIVV supporters

I should not worry. Even I believe that there are sincere and reasonable BKs who will see mbbhat for who and what and at what level he is. Actually it might be a good thing for him to be pulled up by other BKs for his conduct, it will prove to him it was not just a matter of ideological antagonism b...

Thanks for the info. But I don't think I would be able to post there unless PBKs are given an equal right to post and discuss just as all the members (irrespective of their being BK/PBK/ex-BK/ex-PBK/non-BK) are given freedom here. And it is simply disgusting to note that mbbhat, who enjoys (or you ...

This is interesting, they are getting confused over there. It makes me wonder! How on Earth they will separate the PBKs from BK? Impossible! Tell them this much. I cannot tell them, I am banned from posting there. It's "open" but not that open. Still, it's an opportunity to put the PBK po...

Given what a blockhead Mr M B "Low Level of Understanding" Bhat is, I find some of the discussion on the matter quite amusing ... however, there does now seem a genuine opportunity to meet and discuss and correct some of their incorrect view. I agree with this too. Unless one is strong, th...

This may be a historical moment ... the BKs are welcome PBKs to their forum (* terms and conditions apply). The "terms and conditions" being that, like untouchables, they are limited to their own sub-forum which is not seen by the general public unless they make an account. See the discuss...

Have you ever wanted to ask Dadi Janki a question - or give a friend that opportunity? Now is your chance! For the first time ever, Janki Kripalani will be doing a special online Q&A, answering questions sent in by YOU. Leave your question on her Facebook post , Tweet it using the hashtag #AskD...

The soul on the gaddi may be a trance messenger rather than a Chariot... She doesn't look old enough to be one of the original three that ran the Yagya, which are the "they" mentioned in the point warrior Bhai has quoted. I am guessing here, because the photo could have just been taken wh...

Who is the Sister on the guddhi? Thanks for this. Looking at your other post of Kunj Dadi's death, where Nirwair claims she has gone to join the Advance Party, what would have happened to these souls? If this soul was truly the medium or Chariot for the Shiva soul ... as the picture and Murli refere...

If the student has no sincere intention to learn; the teacher has no responsibility to teach them. Mbbhat's intention is purely to confuse, make things appear ugly, jibe at individuals, and spoil this environment so no one can benefit from it. I find their obsession with the PBKs absurd and their mo...

Now, if you believe anyone is free to speak, then why do you have problem with me? It is the same as in a real life discussion. If one is having a real life discussion and someone is constantly disturbing it, deliberately confusing the issue and insulting others when asked not to, there comes a poi...

This is a public discussion. Anyone is free to speak. If you want a private discussion with some PBKs, take it off the forum and into a private environment. No, I am asking you to stop making deliberately false, insulting and provocative statements. It's as much about your intentions are the words y...

4. The new and practical part of ShivBaba was revealed in 1976-77, but AIVV was formally started in 1982. Thank you. That is useful for me. The Professor who wrote the new book on the BK got this very wrong and claimed it was in the 1960s. I wonder why the BKs allowed him to do so? Mbbhat, I have a...

4) What do PBKs say about AIVV:- do they believe AIVV started in 1969 or in 1976 or any other year? I am interested in this answer, I thought it was 1976 but elsewhere I read "1960s" which I think is wrong. As for you. mbbhat, why don't you just go and do the Advance Course? Even if one d...

At least the PBKs are trying to understand and come up with an explanation whilst the BKs are just busy with the scissor cutting pieces out of the Murlis and sweeping the rest under the carpet. Unfortunately, their carpet has such a big bump of changed, unexplained and censored items under it, now e...

... and, there is no proof from Murli points that the photo was against srimath. OK, it is PBKs'views, fine. Ha. Apparently there is no proof that it was against Shrimat to take photos, only evidence to keep photos. Therefore it is OK for BKs to take lots of photos but they must never look at them ...